Edition #9
Rio de Janeiro, 2006
“DKANDLE weaves swirling multi-colored vibrant unearthly soundscapes, blending fuzzy and reverberating Shoegaze textures, mesmerizing Dream Pop meditations, sludgy Grungey tones and moody Post-punk strains, heightened with soul-stirring lyricism and pensive emotive vocalizations”
Originally published in the special edition "The 60s: The Decade that Changed Everything" of Veja magazine
From 1960 to 1969, on every continent, in almost all 145 countries with various political systems, the world witnessed the rebellion of young people. The headlines, alongside wars and even more than sex, spoke of the odyssey of 519 million discontented youths.
According to Marshall McLuhan, these young
people, mutants of the new "planetary oral and
tribal era produced by mass communications,"
represented one-sixth of the Earth's population.
They were both myth and demystifiers of society:
consuming and consumed, contesting and
contested. They fought with all their might to
destroy the old and impose the new. It was a
period of struggle and rejection, both peaceful
and violent.
The youth revolt of the 1960s transcended mere psychological motivations (no longer a "teenage crisis") to encompass new sociological elements and become a social problem. From one day to the next, "our hope for tomorrow" decided to make the present their own. They argued it was necessary to stop being objects of history and become its subjects. From an eternal romantic and symbolic threat, they became destroyers of the established and revered: values and institutions, ideas and taboos. With the urgency fueled by their temporary condition and the courage of their age, they confronted prevailing morality and ripped up the cobblestones to use them to tear down the structures of society, be it capitalist or communist, opulent or impoverished.
Another face of youth was emerging clandestinely,
covertly, more difficult to notice and to repress
than the face of overt violence. It didn't yet have a
proper name and was seen as an offshoot of the
previous years' beatniks. Gradually, some clues
surfaced. A 1960 survey revealed that four out of
five Harvard University students considered
traditional religions to be devoid of metaphysical
content and unhelpful in their search for truth.
A year later, Timothy Leary, a psychology professor
at the same university, continued his research on a
type of Mexican mushroom with hallucinogenic
properties (mescaline) after experimenting with it. He applied 3,500 doses of the drug to 400 student volunteers seeking mystical experiences. Leary and his assistant Richard Alpert transitioned from mescaline to LSD, an even more potent substance and acronym that would become synonymous
with a significant portion of the youth culture in that decade.
The number of "initiates" skyrocketed in a short time, and
within universities, one could already vaguely perceive those
with disheveled hair and unkempt clothes. These young
people differed from the others. They loathed violence as
much as the society they increasingly sought to distance
themselves from. Rejecting religion but seeking God through Eastern mysticism, their numbers grew rapidly. By 1962, the LSD symbol was already recognized in major American universities by the students, though not by the authorities or the public.
The scandal would only explode when Timothy Leary, expelled from Harvard, appealed to the
courts and complained, in the name of science and democracy, of the right to continue his
experiments. In less than a week, a confused America and soon the world became aware of
the "psychedelic" phenomenon. Leary was arrested and confessed to having already applied
LSD to more than a thousand people, half of whom were religiously trained, including 69
Protestant ministers or Catholic priests. Of these people, 75% acknowledged having reached
an intense religious mystical state, and more than half claimed to have had the deepest and
most real experience of their lives.
The "psychedelic revolution" was the path that much of the youth was choosing or would choose. From the middle of the decade came the explosion of flower-power hippies, devotees of LSD and Cannabis. But, in parallel, a problem would take on international proportions also from the years 65-66. Every day, in various countries - from Brazil to Japan, from the United States to Czechoslovakia - students replaced the routine of classes with the routine of strikes, demonstrations, protests
and occupations of universities. Their political organizations multiplied and clashes
with the police became frequent. Common protests gave the same meaning to
demonstrations in various parts of the world: the demonstrations were against the
Vietnam War, against racism, for peace, for the underdeveloped.
Through a vast variety of forms, youth sought to break with everything: with the
university, with the family, with art, with parties. What was new began to have a
value in itself: tradition had to be destroyed. One word went around the world in this
furious storm of denial: contestation.
More than the young, the world had changed. Industrial society was advancing, breaking principles, modifying relationships and living conditions; the media broke regional values and introduced a uniform, borderless culture. In the face of values such as love, freedom, justice and brotherhood, a new reality emerged - consumption - establishing its own values: efficiency, success, competition. More effectively than sociology in its quest to shape youth, large commercial organizations discovered the full potential of consumers in young people: in just forty years, the number of young people under 24 would double. An entire production line - records, clothes, shows - was designed from them for them. The characters that young people transformed into idols (from the Beatles to Che Guevara), precisely because they had challenged the system, were returned to them, commercialized: Mao fashion, shirts with Che's face, Beatles posters. Consumption transformed the contestation of it into a profitable consumer product.
A new dynamic emerged. Young people challenged society and society consumed the challenge. A desperate search for affirmation to make their negation valid began to be carried out in all fields - in fashion, painting, cinema, and especially in music. Their colors screamed as much as their sound, aggressive and agonizing. The romantic nightclubs gave way to discos where everything moved, especially the light and the bodies. The "rock'n'roll" of the 50s was rejuvenated by Chubby Checker's "twist", then by the "jerk", "frug", "monkey", "surf", "let kiss", "drag", all short-lived, where only the gestures and names varied. Dancing became the most imperious and exclusive form of expression. In Tokyo and New York, São Paulo and Paris, discos and musical groups multiplied, as well as in Poland, Hungary, Czechoslovakia. Everywhere, the Beatles. To these rhythmic extroversions, the retreat into drugs was opposed. The search for "trips", escapes and "self-knowledge" intensified vertiginously.
It was pointed out as a sociological singularity of youth the fact that, being essentially transitory, it did not constitute a social category. But young people were increasingly grouping together in clubs, nightclubs, and gatherings. The insistence on appearance (dress, hair), on the typical gesture (own language, dance) was already considered as a first step towards becoming a social category. The large gatherings - such as Woodstock, where hundreds of thousands of people gathered to talk about peace, music and to live days of complete freedom - demonstrated the deep sense of
community that was forming among the young people of that decade and the
mystical understanding of themselves as a separate group: an "us" in open
opposition to "them". "They" are the adult world of parents and their impotence
in living the values they preach. "They" are also the social systems incapable
of filling the void between ideal and reality. The realization of the failure of the
civilization created by previous generations - of wars, social injustices,
violence, oppression - and the contemplation of the amorphous mass of cases, files and numbers in which man is sometimes transformed by consumer society, exploded in the consciousness of the young people of the 60s, who began to deny all the visible manifestations of this civilization.
To withdraw or to participate in the destruction of society: this was the choice they faced. Withdrawal was the hippie response. More than 400,000 young people in the USA alone turned their backs on society and set out in search of other truths. The hippies marginalized themselves and attempted a revolution of morals and customs. Young people in socialist countries demanded political freedom, while those in the industrialized countries of the West contested the consumer civilization that alienates man. In the third world, the struggle was for economic freedom.
"Do you know what's happening?" No, nobody knew. Obsolete forms of struggle were unearthed (stones, barricades, clubs), temples of knowledge like the Sorbonne were invaded, idols of other generations like Sartre and the historical communist Aragon were booed, cars were set on fire, theaters were taken over. Imagination had seized power. All official and traditional values were written in quotation marks and provoked laughter. The streets were renamed by hundreds of euphoric youths who chose the new names with applause: Red Orient Street, Heroic Vietnam Street, Guevara Street. Red and black flags fluttered over austere monuments and covered historical relics. Love and politics began to be made on the streets.
Were the 60s the best decade ever? Give your opinion in the comments
below
previous page: CHIPSET ZERØ (INTERVIEW)
next page: BRAZIL IS TOO NOISY
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE:
THE LESSON FROM THE PORTUGUESE
Treating drug users as patients reduced drug use
JUST SAY "KNOW"
Last text by Timothy Leary
about drugs
THE BIG CIRCUS
OF SHOWBIZ
The scheme revealed